Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kevao
There's also a BIG difference between an accuser who comes forward and names herself and one who doesn't.

Exactly! If an accuser(s) is coming forward who refuses to be named, it is a very good indication they are doing this for some kind of gain. This is why I heavily suspect Mittens and Perrywinkle.

222 posted on 11/03/2011 11:08:38 AM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: Thane_Banquo

Strange as it sounds, Anita Hill had more credibility than any of Herman Cain’s anonymous accusers.


233 posted on 11/03/2011 11:11:34 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

To: Thane_Banquo

Wait a minute. These women didn’t come forward themselves.

The assertion that Cain committed sexual harassment and settled out of court with two women was made to Politico by a former board member of the NRA. These women are not at fault for leaking the story. It doesn’t appear they did anything for personal gain at this point.

They came forward at the time of the alleged incidents, filed complaints against Cain, and settled out of court. That they are anonymous right now is due to the legal requirements of the settlement. We have yet to see if they will be allowed to come forward.


378 posted on 11/03/2011 12:05:00 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson