What does he do? Well, first, he writes down exactly what his campaign did this time, and NEVER DOES IT AGAIN.
But what can he do? You are right, there is to some degree no way to look perfect. But it is clear that you can keep and gain supporters with such charges filed, if they are either false or if there is no evidence so you can plausibly dismiss them.
You learn lessons from your past campaigns. (Cain can’t do that). You learn lessons from other past campaigns. Remember Gary Hart? He not only denied something that was happening, he actually challenged the media to look for things, saying they wouldn’t find anything. That was like throwing chum in the water.
Cain did the same, when he not only denied the allegations, but also pre-emptively said that if ANY other women came forward, they would ALL be liars. When you say you NEVER EVER DID something, the media will try to prove you wrong. That happened to George Allen in 2006, when he, trying to dismiss a random charge of racism that was absurd, and that even the media seemed to be ready to help him on, claimed he had NEVER said the “n-word”. Well, he was in college in the 70s-80s. People said the n-word. I regularly sang a song in boy scouts that included the n-word, it was insulting to blacks, we didn’t know it, it wasn’t how we meant it, but we did it.
So when he said “never”, the media felt obligated to find every person who ever thought Allen had said it.
OK, so what COULD have Cain said. Here’s one suggestion, if I had been his campaign chair, for a statement:
“As you know, I am a Christian, and a minister. As such, I have tried to live my life according to His precepts, but I am imperfect, as are we all. What I can say is that I never intentionally sexually harassed anyone. I do not believe my actions in these cases, or at any other time, would be considered sexual harrassment, and I certainly did not intend to harm these or any other women. I am sorry that actions I took that I believe to this day were appropriate were nonetheless interpreted by these women as harrassment, and apologize for my part. I wish these women well, and hope that my running for office has not exposed them unnecessarily, or caused them unwanted attention that they sought to avoid with their settlements.
Being bound by agreement and civility not to discuss these matters lightly, I would ask that if you have any additional questions, you would please submit them in writing to my campaign. I will have my legal team review them and, to the extent I am allowed and the questions are not of a purient nature, I will provide verbal and written responses later today.
Now, I wish to get back to the important business of saving this country from four more disastrous years of an Obama presidency. Thank you, and good day.
Well played, Charles. I really like Cain, what he stands for and yes, his character. However, he seems not ready for Prime Time. If I were running for office, I’d hire the meanest, roughest, most ruthless private investigator out there to examine MY background. Heck, I’d hire Larry Flynt! That way I’d KNOW what could POSSIBLY come out in an election, and how I would deal with any questions that would (inevitably) arise. The dems are masters of sheet sniffing and garbology. The republicans are pikers when it comes to this.