[McLynnan]

These allegations need to be investigated and Cain’s name cleared if they are untrue. We don’t need another Slick Willy in the White House. I could chalk one allegation up to an opportunistic gold digger, but we are seeing more than one. It is unusual for a man to have even one sexual harrassment allegation against him, but Cain has more than one and the MSM is reporting more are to come. This is a problem for me. I don’t like how quickly the finger was pointed at Perry with no proof. These allegations against Cain are not rumor. Why would it be improper for any candidate to ask him to explain them?

[BobL]

“I could chalk one allegation up to an opportunistic gold digger, but we are seeing more than one. “

I’ve counted ONE legitimate allegation so far. As far as the others are concerned, it is all HEARSAY.

As far as I’m concerned, these other women from his past simply are liberals that don’t want him to become president, and they are now making this crap up to try to sink him. No different than Anita Hill.

If THEY have EVIDENCE (not hearsay), I want to see it. Maybe taped phone calls, documents, dresses, etc. I’m sorry, but I will not go running to Romney because a bunch of liberal women don’t want to see Cain become president.

[not2worry]

I don't like how quickly the finger was pointed at Cain that the settlement was characterized as something sensation when the “journalist” would not name names or give sources.

Journalistic privileges to destroy someone’s character with “sources” and “allegations”.

What a mess!