Replies

Im talking about Cain accusing Perry of being behind this all.

If Cain doesnt have evidence that Perry is behind a smear campaign, it will all backfire on Cain.

>>If Cain doesnt have evidence that Perry is behind a smear campaign, it will all backfire on Cain.<<

Curt Anderson who worked on Cain’s senate campaign knew about the harassment allegations is now working for Perry. Wonder who leaked it?

Jonathan Martin is the reporter who dropped the McCain affair story from Politico to the NYT in February 2008 the "rumor" at the time was Romney campaign dropped stories to Martin who then printed them in Politico or passed them on, American Spectator put up a small blurb late in 2008 that is was the Romney camp who dropped the anti-Palin stories on Politico, this was pretty much confirmed at the time by some of the investigations done by Redstate.

The point is, this is all the same stuff we saw in 2008 and Perry was not running for President then. The fact is Cain has already stated he would support Romney and never, ever, support Perry so he has an ax to grind of some sort with Perry which makes this accusation more than a little suspect in my mind. This is starting to look Tiger Woodish to me.

You’re way behind the power curve on this one. We KNOW who the accuers are, their motives and their connections. And in the process we’ve connected al of them to the GOP and demrat party.

I don’t want to spoil your enlightenment. I suggest you scroll back to the beginning of this post and then read all the comments.