[Carl from Marietta]

If you’re not capable of understanding what Cain said then you’re completely incapable of posting on this forum with any interesting insight.

What Cain said is only ambiguous to imbeciles.

[Sudetenland]

I am making the point that he was unabiguous. He did not know that the Chinese were nuclear capable. No way to misunderstand what he said—except for people who are so emotionally invested in him that they are incapable of thinking clearly.

[Sudetenland]

"If you’re not capable of understanding what Cain said then you’re completely incapable of posting on this forum with any interesting insight."

Glad you recognize the Cainiacs' flaws. Anytime you become so emotionally attached to a candidate that you are incapable of believing anything at all negative about them--without even investigating them or questioning your beliefs--then you are seriously in danger of being led by your emotions rather than your brain.

The words that Cain spoke were unambiguously naive. If he meant that they were pursuing a nuclear naval capability, then he should have expressly said so. He didn't, so he is vulnerable to being called pathetically naive--just like he was pathetically naive on what was meant by "right of return." The man is not qualified to be President of the United States if he is that naive and ambiguous in his understanding and positions on foreign policy issues.