Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brandonmark
Respond to what?

What are the allegations?

What was the pay off if any?

Should he break his conf. Ag. to impress someone? That is contempt of court and opens him to damages.

Please, these are baseless allegations until there is a clue as to what ‘inappropriate’ means.

28 posted on 11/02/2011 3:43:14 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Jim from C-Town

That is the whole point of the sexual harassment law. Inappropriate means whatever the person complaining about it wants it to mean. I went to EO training in the Army and the guidance was that it did not matter if the person saying or doing something meant to be offensive, it was all in how the receiver perceived it. I think sexual harassment laws are unconstitutional because they stifle free speech. I always thought that protecting offensive speech was the entire point of that amendment.


55 posted on 11/02/2011 4:55:18 PM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Jim from C-Town
show me a man that has never done wrongful things and I'll show you a woman.....

I don't condone bad behavior but for pete's sake we let a guy be president who had many accusations against him, some from open and reliable sources and he paid off big time to one of them...

pull it together people....

I now believe that H.Cain can beat the zero if somehow we get him the nomination....

he's an imperfect man but thankfully he's man and not a wimp or a puppet...

71 posted on 11/02/2011 6:10:44 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson