Actually, yes. PhD Analytical Chemist..40 years practice in chemical industry R&D..24+ granted patents...~20+ refereed publications..2 R&D100 awards.
" Maybe you you ought to patent your methodology - Agilent, Omega and a host of other companies that specialize in data-logging will be demolished."
Datalogging is wonderful, but good science "can" be done with bare-bones methods. You trade off time spent for cheaper tools.
But I simply cannot grasp that people who supposedly know something about science and technology are so recalcitrant to actually go and look at the PRIMARY DATA, but will spend hours looking at and arguing over secondary reports, often generated by people who actually have an "ax to grind".
I'm not asking you to believe "my" commentary, but to GO AND LOOK AT THE PRIMARY DATA AND DECIDE FOR YOURSELF!!!!
The primary reports are in the "Library" section of the LENR/CANR website. What is in the "News" section may just be a summary of those.
I looked at 'primary data' for the 10/6 test. The weighing device was a bathroom scale calibrated to two people that knew their weight.
And we are supposed to believe that they could measure the H2 charge down to the 1/4 gram? Give me a break!
” PhD Analytical Chemist”
OK, then why don’t you give us the equation by which his device works since you claim to understand the report? Go ahead, we’ll wait. Describe it the best you can. No hurry. So far, Rossi hasn’t, not even in his patent application.