[SpaceBar]

A multifaceted question. Much of the controversy stems directly from the carnival side-show like tone of Rossi’s E-CAT “press releases”, together with no concrete details other than innuendo and citing others’ work. Then you got a handful of posters right here on FR who choose to defend “Rossi’s honor” like new black panthers at a polling place, suggesting a financial or commercial motive beyond just posting an interesting or amusing news article worthy of comment. They know who they are.

[cripplecreek]

[NewinTexsas]

“Rossi’s honor”

Rossi, the twice-convicted scammer whose scientific education is from a diploma mill that was shut down for awarding fake diplomas ....

[Kevmo]

Then you got a handful of posters right here on FR who choose to defend “Rossi’s honor”
***I defend Rossi’s data. I could care less about his honor. Either he’s a scam artist or he’s gonna be a billionaire, so he cares little about someone defending his honor. And that’s just the thing — all you guys see is someone defending a scam artist, because that is all you want to see, all you can see. You cannot see the forest for the trees.

like new black panthers at a polling place, suggesting a financial or commercial motive
***Typical troll tactic suggesting an even wider conspiracy theory. The cool thing about this tactic is that I know my own motives and so I know you’re way off.

beyond just posting an interesting or amusing news article worthy of comment
***Sure it’s worthy of comment but troll tactics, classic fallacies and seagull scat should be posted elsewhere.