And why would you believe anything these women say?
Did you believe the stripper in the Duke case?
Why would these women come forth 12 years later if not for someone bankrolling their lies?
Rush said today that one of the women’s lawyers no longer even has the agreement on file. Nor did the lawyer remember who the complaint was against (Cain). Nor did he remember any meetings with the restaurant association.
There was just a decision by the Obama administration that they do not have to release documents based on Freedom of Information inquiries. I think Cain should do the same thing.
I’m not saying I’d believe them - but at least we knew the Duke case involved a stripper. I’m thinking once these women show their faces they’ll be shown to be the losers they must be. Right now they benefit from anonymonity - the left gets to imply the worst.
I cannot imagine that Cain did anything significant. There is such a thing as sexual harassment - involving a demand for sex for favorable job treatment - NOT saying someone looks nice or they have nice perfume. As I said before - this is disgusting. Lawyers and feminists have turned many of our men into sniveling shadows. And I’m a woman who doesn’t like this one bit.
“Why would these women come forth 12 years later if not for someone bankrolling their lies?”
More to the point (for me), this sort of thing doesn’t happen just once, just as pedophiles don’t have just one nasty photo on their computers. If this were a sign of Cain’s character, they’d be coming out of the woodwork and piling on. I smell a big, fat, nasty Rat.
Colonel, USAFR