The lawyer making comments does not have the agreement in hand and has no idea what it says. He does remember the details. Huh? The lawyers says “now that Cain is talking about specifics, the confidentiality agreements may no longer be binding”. He says this without knowing anything. Apparently without knowing if Cain is even referring to his client? Former client?
This is either a very stupid lawyer or what we are watching is very bad theater....
IMO, he’s smells a payday. After researching this guy, I’ve come up with nothing memorable.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2800951/posts
“I can tell you also that I don’t represent people who are trying to shake down employers.”