In all fairness dude....
“If I came into your work as a competitor and disrupted your business, you would not ban me?
Going on with the protests in NY. The vendors want rid of the hippies, they are destroying the store’s bathrooms.
If I came into your church and taught - say allah is great, you would not ban me?
If any muzzie comes in anyplace and says the word “allah” trust me, you are f*****. “Allah” is the last word you hear before they try to get their 72 virgins.
If I came into your school and taught marxist doctrine to your kids, you would not ban me?
Already happening! Homeschool!
If I came into your HOME....”
Castle laws. Here you have a valid point! Or as we say on Free Republic ZOT!
As a long time FReeper, I agree that disruptive posters be banned. However, the issue I responded to was the banning of pro Romney posters.
As a long time conservative activist, Romney would be the last candidate I would vote for, but banning any pro Romney posters seems to me extreme. Where is the line drawn? Are we right wingers going to enforce a rigid orthodoxy like the commies we despise?