[Safrguns]

If the mother’s life is in danger, it’s not an issue of abortion.

It’s an issue of saving a life, and that is best handled between the doctor and patient. There is no one-size fits all for those RARE situations.

This nation aborts millions annually, and all the left want to focus on is the .0001 % of cases where the mother’s life is at risk.

[independent in tx]

“It’s an issue of saving a life, and that is best handled between the doctor and patient. There is no one-size fits all for those RARE situations.”

Agree totally. But as long as those .0001% cases are grouped equally with the other two ‘optional’ cases (ie. rape/incest), it makes independents nervous.

Done with this thread now.

[.30Carbine]

If the mother’s life is in danger, it’s not an issue of abortion. It’s an issue of saving a life, and that is best handled between the doctor and patient. There is no one-size fits all for those RARE situations. This nation aborts millions annually, and all the left want to focus on is the .0001 % of cases where the mother’s life is at risk.

I am praising God for your clear thinking on a thread that because of it's subject matter can get all muddied!