Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The first sign of Obama's subterfuge came in late 2010, as California prepared to vote on a ballot proposition that would have legalized growing and possessing small amounts of marijuana for anyone over 21. Under pressure from teetotalers — nine former Drug Enforcement Agency chiefs begged Obama to oppose the measure — Attorney General Eric Holder said it didn't matter what Californians thought. The feds would continue to bust people regardless of the election.

...On October 5, the IRS ruled that one of the largest California dispensaries, Harborside Health Center, owed $2.5 million in taxes because federal law precluded standard deductions for businesses engaging in illegal activity.

In other words, Obama was not only blowing off state laws. He was declaring that legal businesses were now nothing more than criminal rackets. And he was carving away every tool they needed to function.

Why the reversal by Obama on medical marijuana? He indulged in it heavily when younger so why the crackdown now?

1 posted on 10/26/2011 5:48:17 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PJ-Comix

Because he’s a complete tool and giant flaming hypocrite, perhaps?


2 posted on 10/26/2011 5:50:43 PM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Why the reversal by Obama on medical marijuana? He indulged in it heavily when younger so why the crackdown now?

Why do you think it is Obama who makes any of these decisions?

5 posted on 10/26/2011 5:58:50 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Why the reversal by Obama on medical marijuana? He indulged in it heavily when younger so why the crackdown now?

No surprise there. The left has advocated drug use for years in order to foment revolution and alter and change the moral fiber of America. Now that the goal of communism is almost here he needs to clamp down so he can better control the populace.

6 posted on 10/26/2011 6:03:19 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Aren’t these dispensaries supplied by domestic farms? I thought that was the case in California. If they were getting weed off the Mexican narco market, I could see landing on this with both feet. But as it is, even if all of this weed ended up going to recreational users with lame excuses, it represents a lot of weed that would not be bought from Mexico.

In the meantime, it looks like American tolerance for the idea of legal marijuana has gotten to the 50% point according to one poll. I would not “recommend” marijuana (unless for a specific medical use that could be documented) any more than I would “recommend” tobacco or “recommend” getting habitually drunk on alcohol, but certain things may not be worth banning given that the unintended consequences of doing so are worse than the consequences of the habit.


7 posted on 10/26/2011 6:05:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

He probably noticed that politicians “hard on drugs” get re-elected, and politicians who want to change the drug laws don’t, pretty much ever.

Drug warriors get votes, that’s why we have the laws we do.


9 posted on 10/26/2011 6:08:25 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

The doper fools think it’s o.k. if the feds go after those who smoke tobacco, as long as one of their number is Prez.

The truth is a government that is able to take prohibit one thing that’s considered to be a vice is able to prohibit any other thing that’s considered to be a vice.

Eventually that government will prohibit all things that have been determined to be bad and require all things that have been determined to be good.


10 posted on 10/26/2011 6:16:53 PM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
By late last year, California reportedly had more dispensaries than Starbucks outlets.

That's a lot of sick people.

12 posted on 10/26/2011 6:21:28 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
He's doing it to agitate the millions of pot smokers in California and elsewhere, to get them to join OWS and other types of protests. Just like the Bailouts, Obama supported it, the OWS people claim to be against it, but they will all vote for Obama anyway. Ultimately, Obama wants to destroy the country more than he wants to get reelected, but this wont hurt his chances of reelection anyway.
14 posted on 10/26/2011 6:44:35 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

He swore an oath to the Constitution, which permits the federal government no role in intrastrate commerce. If Californians are growing for their own consumption, then California law — not federal law — determines its legality.


16 posted on 10/26/2011 10:14:41 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
It's simple: he needs campaign money. In advance of the carrot, he's using the stick. He may need two billion dollars to win this time. The medical marijuana industry in California is going to have to cough up big time if it wants to continue to exist. If he wins, then he'll decriminalize marijuana at the federal level.
19 posted on 10/27/2011 4:44:55 PM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson