That's a strawman (it's false), and you know it. If it's true, it applies in reverse to you (no chronic corruption in the system), as it does to me. Oh, and no ones opinion counts, but yours.
What do you make of the lower courts disregarding what Presser says, and substituting a falsehood? Not corrupt? An error of decades long duration, SCOTUS was offered more than one opportunity to correct the error below, and didn't, and still hasn't.
-- Last person I interviewed with blatant an opinion was Lyndon LaRouche. --
Heh. Well, you don't budge either, Mr. MindBender.
They disagree with Presser. Big deal. All inter-jurisdictional cases come from courts disagreeing with each other.
The courts today disagree with Scott v. Sanford and thousands of other prior decisions. Does than then make those decisions right or wrong?
The major problem is that the majority of the people on SCOTUS don’t agree with you. That doesn’t make them corrupt, that simple means we must work harder to elect a president who will appoint judges to our liking.