[lquist1]

“We must remain united. Divided we fall.”

I can unite behind a Cain, Gingrich, Bachmann, Santorum, Perry, Huntsman, perhaps even Ron Paul, but I can’t unite behind a guy whose past governing positions are closer to Obama’s than they are the other GOP candidates. Sure, he talks a different game now, but like Obama, Romney’s words have an expiration date. For this reason, you don’t really know what you’ll get if he’s elected. But most likely he would line up politically with his buddy and point man from the Mass Senate-Scott Brown.

Brown ran as a conservative (backed by the Tea Party), then quickly proceeded to become one of the 2 or 3 most liberal senators. We can’t afford a guy like that at POTUS-not with our current condition. If Romney is the nominee, I believe going 3rd party is well worth the risk.

[Chunga]

perhaps even Ron Paul

Ron Paul blames The United States for 9/11. He's Class A 100% jackass.

[presently no screen name]

If Romney is the nominee, I believe going 3rd party is well worth the risk.

Absolutely! There is no splitting the party - he doesn't belong in our party. Let him go back to his liberal roots.

[USS Alaska]

I believe going 3rd party is well worth the risk.

Just vote straight demonRAT and cut out the middle man.

You vote third party, you vote for obummer.

A conservative that is pissed at the "liberal candidate" that the elite "push down out throats" is worse than a black that votes straight demonRAT.

The black at least has an opportunity of getting something for their vote, the disillusioned, disgruntled, conservative gets only more heartbreak; and another FOUR MORE YEARS.