Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNJohnnie
He’s talking about the entire government, not just the presidency, and of course it’s a core argument for pro-lifers that Congress should act to make this decision on behalf of women if/when Roe v. Wade is overturned. A moment later he told Morgan that his opinion as president shouldn’t necessarily operate as a “directive” on the nation, but then he was back to broad language about government again: “The government shouldn’t be trying to tell people everything to do, especially when it comes to a social decision that they need to make.” No pro-choicer could say it any better. How did we get from that to “I am 100% pro-life, end of story” in the span of 24 hours?

He is talking out of both sides of his mouth.

32 posted on 10/20/2011 7:02:12 PM PDT by wmfights (PERRY 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: wmfights
How did we get from that to “I am 100% pro-life, end of story” in the span of 24 hours?

Because the Perrygasmics want to ignore the fact that the answer they are twisting was to a question not about abortion, but whether his (hypotheitically raped) grandchild should have to raise the child after birth. A child, who in Perry's views, should be able to be aborted by the way.

45 posted on 10/20/2011 7:06:42 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson