“Are you a moron, or are you possessed by a retarded ghost? As challenged show me where did I explicited state that, not your sorry derailed logic. Facts are he was a mormon and as such his decisions were influenced by his beliefs. Only a stark raving loon would infer that I am advocating a legislated religion - open you constitution and read it before emptying your mind.”
No, I’m not a Mormon, but I’m not a bigot like you who supports something that the Constitution bars dumbass. You said before that, because Mitt didn’t disavow his religion, he governed as a Mormon. You have no proof of that, and it makes your prediction on how he’d be as president look stupid.
“If a person claims a religious belief - that is not a public decision politics - pretty simple to figure out - I would have expected that even you could have. In case you haven’t figured it out - you are digging a very deep hole for yourself.”
I didn’t say it was a public decision. You said that any candidate who would be a Muslim who didn’t support Sharia Law would be accused as being a non-believer. I said it wouldn’t be up to the public to decide.
“Nor the constitution either - yet we see with this one the backdoor moves to challenge our 2d amendment rights and if empowered by a like thinking congress can legislate to overturn the SC - checks and balances thing you didn’t learn in school - you must have had a public education.”
This has nothing to do with Mitt Romney or abortion. You claimed that the Constitution protected the right to an abortion, because of the Supreme Court, just like it protects religion, when it does not.
“And you are a bigger bigot to say I can’t use his religious beliefs as part of my evaluation of his qualifications to be president. His religion is a component of why I don’t want him as president. Small minded people like yourself fail to grasp that simple concept.”
You’ve yet to show how as Governor of Mass. he governed negatively through his Mormonism or as a Mormon. You can evaluate him as a Mormon, but then you can’t like the Constitution, because the Constitution bars that.
“You have an open mind, and a mouth to match. And that same constitution ALLOWS ANYONE (PROTECTS THE RIGHT) to judge the capabilities of that person for office based upon ANY criteria they desire.
You should really read the constitution to understand where you are wrong some time. Unfortunately you’ll have to read it - it doesn’t come in a picture version.”
Your criteria is bigoted, it you are using the First Amendment to say something that the Constitution bars
You really have absolutely no understanding of that which you are posting do you.