Don't say things like that politics; it just makes you sound stupid. In fact, don't talk at all. It just makes you sound stupid. Thinking isn't your strong point, is it?
Are you going to advocate that a jihadi moslem be allowed to run for president and NOT evaluate his religious beliefs? So spare us the self-righteousness of everyone being a bigot except for your self. A person's religious beliefs are a valid criterion to use to evaluated a candidate's qualifications for office by individual voters.
It is no more un-American to advocate on the basis of religion than it is to advocate on the basis of abortion rights for instance. It is not un-american to oppose a pro-abortion candidate.
You don't like that critera - thats YOUR choice - but it is un-american as well as un FR to insist that you "CHOICE" is the only correct one.
Are you going to advocate that a jihadi moslem be allowed to run for president and NOT evaluate his religious beliefs? So spare us the self-righteousness of everyone being a bigot except for your self. A person’s religious beliefs are a valid criterion to use to evaluated a candidate’s qualifications for office by individual voters.”
I already answered that you moron. Read below, where I wrote, “Mitt Romney has already been governor of Mass. without governing as a Mormon. If a politician advocated Sharia Law, they couldn’t be president, since Sharia Law would overrule the constitution. That doesn’t mean a Muslim can’t be president. Also, Sharia Law violates the First Amendment.”
“It is no more un-American to advocate on the basis of religion than it is to advocate on the basis of abortion rights for instance. It is not un-american to oppose a pro-abortion candidate. “
Yes it is different, because Religion is protected by the Constitution.