We have, but the Admin Moderator may not have to time to review the details of these posts and hasn’t acted.
Kevmo’s posts on a 1 for 1 basis aren’t any threat. It is the patch work of PR stories etc.. that are the danger.
You almost have to review Kevmo’s posting history to determine that he is either a paid or unpaid shill for this man. He does need an intervention.
LOL. What RIDICULOUS logic. A more likely explanation is that the Admin Moderator had and has no problem with Kev's postings. And whether that was so, or they just "hadn't had time to review the details"....YOU and your crowd of censors have no authority to take it upon yourselves to "make it right".
Kevmos posts on a 1 for 1 basis arent any threat. It is the patch work of PR stories etc.. that are the danger."
Kev's postings are no danger whatsoever. The only danger is in your mind and those others who want to shut down discussion of Rossi/Cold fusion.
"You almost have to review Kevmos posting history to determine that he is either a paid or unpaid shill for this man. He does need an intervention."
I have seen more people telling Kevmo to "keep up the good work" than telling you "spam-censors" to do so.
So it appears that the ones who "need intervention" are you and the rest of the seagulls.
Kevmos posts on a 1 for 1 basis arent any threat.
***Then quit bothering me.
It is the patch work of PR stories etc.. that are the danger.
***Like your other conspiracy theories, you’ll need to produce evidence of this. But you won’t.
You almost have to review Kevmos posting history to determine that he is either a paid or unpaid shill for this man. He does need an intervention.
***I’ve been a freeper for 14 years or so. Never heard of this Rossi guy until last year. Almost everything you post that can be checked turns out not to be true. What does that tell the inductive reasoner about the stuff you post which cannot be checked?