Re: #283, never implied Romney was honest and have never hawked for him in any form. Perry’s attack on that subject was misguided as I pointed out; he tried to use that phony diversionary tactic and it smacked of desperation. BTW just because something is veto proof doesn’t mean you can’t veto it anyway. That’s what I would want my governor (and he is my governor) to do.
I want someone other than Romney to win this thing. At this stage, Cain is more viable than Perry. But if worse comes to worse, I would rather have a fake crony from New Hampshire over a Kenyan citizen that doesn’t rightfully belong in the White House. How ‘bout you?
I would rather have Cain than Romney. I would rather have Perry than Cain or Romney. Perry knows the energy industry and the border problem. Cain and Romney lack his expertise on both. I'd rather have anyone except Paul than Romney.
You said at this point Cain is more viable than Perry. I think that's a subjective opinion, because financially and structurally, its the other way around. Depends how you want to look at that.