Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bvw

7 3-hour debates with Newt and obama would be a beautiful thing to behold. obama would never consent to it. I suppose he could claim ‘time constraints’....he had to run a country...but what are we to believe....his tee-time is a restrictive?


1,556 posted on 10/18/2011 7:12:43 PM PDT by Texas Songwriter (I ou)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1497 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Songwriter

Obama is immature and empty, Gingrich is mature and at his full powers. That would NOT be interesting as a debate. It would be awful.

It might even be like the awful match between world champion boxer Muhammad Ali and the strange pro “wrestler” Antonio Inoki, June 26, 1976 in Tokyo. A DRAW! For 15 rounds Inoki laid on his back and kicked at Ali. Ali landed only 6 punches. The low kicks damaged Ali permanently.

When I used the paper towel versus tsunami analogy I wasn’t kidding. The analogy works both ways. Newt is vastly superior to Obama in knowledge, maturity, logic and normal debate skills.

But Obama can just lay on his back and kick at Gingrich, like a tsunami wave only a foot deep can destroy much of a town. Obama will pour out words and words, each phrase sounding good, but no sentence making much sense and no paragraph making any sense at all.


1,641 posted on 10/18/2011 7:28:08 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1556 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson