A Mittbot is some one who when confronted with Mitt’s obvious liberal positions, excuses them and thinks conservatives should not be so dogmatic about our principles. They are people who will say anything to cloud the issue at hand in order to make Mitt look good.
That was not Herman Cain. That was you. Absurd was when an audience booed Mitt’s wanting gays in the military answer and you argued they were just booing the question.
I understand Cain completely. He sounds just like me and millions of other conservatives. We understand him. You are the one who wants to paint him as a liar. That you are still up to the slimy tricks you tried four years ago does not surprise me one bit.
Bump.
What the hell are you talking about? The argument was that our connservatives in the audience were booing the guy who ASKED the question because he was gay. THAT was the lie that we were countering by pointing out that the audience was booing the QUESTION he asked. The booing happened before Mitt answered the question, and nobody suggested people were booing Mitt's answer.
I don't even know what Mitt's answer WAS, because i only saw the clip on youtube which ended when the booing happened. I could care less what Mitt's answer was. I never said ONE WORD about Mitt's answer. My guess is either you are just making things up again, or you confused me with someone else.
As to Cain "lying", One of his SUPPORTERS said he was lying. I argued that he was NOT lying. I said that many times in the thread, so I don't know how you missed that.