So your argument seems to be that we have every right to shoot them if we catch them crossing the border, but once they have gotten past some point, we have no right to shoot them?
You said “No one want sto kill them just because...”, but that’s what it means to shoot them just for crossing the border. And if you support shooting people who trespass, why does it matter whether we shoot them when they first trespass, or wait until later? What exactly DO you support?
Your remaining argument in nonsensical, and is the equivalent of saying that because I wouldn’t shoot a door-to-door salesman, I must be OK with an armed robber breaking into my house.
A country has a right to defend it’s borders, but not to use any means it feels like to do so, under any circumstances. We don’t shoot people for crossing borders. There are countries that do; but unless they are in a defacto state of war, we don’t support them.
If we are invaded by the mexican military, we can shoot them. If armed thugs come into our country, we should be shooting them.
Based on your premise, we have no borders and should stand by and let anyone cross illegally...would you feel the same if it was Iran, after all they would be no different that Mexican.
Or is it just certain nationalities that should be allowed to illegally enter our country...how do you feel about illegals from Saudi Arabia, communist china etc....If they resist arrest from border patrol, you seem to think we should give them a free pass, maybe ever some money so they can buy some food..
That is my answer to your first paragraph and you come off as a bleeding heart old lady living in a house full of cats...
For your second paragraph, first action is not shooting anyone, but arresting them. If they resist, and run shoot them...damn right, we don't know if they are smuggling narcotics or terrorists from the middle east.
Citizens that live near the border should be able to shoot anyone trespassing on their property, but one stupid ass judge gave the illegals a man ranch cause he shot at one. The illegal sued, so if that's what you believe, your belief sucks big time....Do you think the judge was correct in giving an American citizens ranch to a group of illegals..???
Many would like hear your opinion on that one...
You must not pay too much attention to what many illegals have done. Murder, manslaughter, rape and were caught. They were illegals should we just send them back to mexico because the poor souls are victims of American judicial system.
What should be done with those that commit crimes, felonies and murder/rape. Whats your suggestion about the tunnels dug by drug loads under the border. Should they be allowed to just simply walk across and not be bothered.
When you stop an illegal, you have no idea of their past or what they intend to do...Far better to stop, arrest and if they run, shoot them like you would any criminal on the streets that resisted arrest and many of these illegals carry some pretty heavy weapons...
The rest of your post is just as stupid..Oh and by the way, the mexican military has invaded us at the southern border, they were spotted 70 miles inside our borders.... Wake up or shut up. Answer if you must, but don't expect me to read it...I have a low tolerance for stupid in my old age....
Like Clint says''get off my lawn" as I LOL at you..
PS my sister's boyfriend is a legal tex-mex and he hates the illegals, they think they are too good to stand in line like the rest of the legal immigrants have...you have some warped idea that these illegals are just innocent people. They aren't that why we call the ILLEGALS. They use to be called WET BACKS which was the description of how they got here. Swimming the Rio Grande River...but that is politically incorrect. Thats why I used it...grow up