[DTxAg]

So your opposition is political, not fiscal? He could just give a vague outline in flowery conservative sounding language like all the others. I appreciate that he isn't.

Personally, I MIGHT be better off under 9-9-9, but I can't be sure until the final plan is unveiled where he doesn't contradict himself (like saying charitable contributions are the only deduction while saying medical stuff is also a deduction).

Nominating someone whose plan increases taxes on lots of people is a horrible idea politically. Introducing a national sales tax without simultaneously repealing the 16th Amendment is a recipe for disaster. And until Cain says that the 9-9-9 plan is just a starting point for discussion, it is the central policy in his campaign.

[Pan_Yan]

I think it’s pretty obvious you and I have the same basic goals and agree on the same fundamentals. We may not agree on which is exactly the right path to get us where we need to go but we don’t have to. I also think we have the same concerns about the candidates and their vision and plans. Thanks for the discussion, I enjoyed it.