You didn’t contrast their positions on immigration. Any particular reason why you didn’t do that?
Because, aside from signing a residency bill for in-state tuition, there really isn't an issue?
The in-state residency is something Texans were going to have to deal with anyway: they were already here (at least 3 years), we could not deport them (Feds rule), and it was a way of ensuring that they would apply for citizenship.
Please see post #37.