To: Clairity
The writer creates a straw-man argument.
He automatically assumes that taxes on all levels will be increased in the future.
Until actual legislation is written, the premise of this article is meaningless.
35 posted on
10/08/2011 4:42:27 PM PDT by
2111USMC
(Not a hard man to track. Leaves dead men wherever he goes.)
To: 2111USMC
He automatically assumes that taxes on all levels will be increased in the future. Yeah, what a crackpot assumption! I mean, we all know the tendency of government is to take less and less and...oh wait. Nevermind.
40 posted on
10/08/2011 4:50:00 PM PDT by
Huck
(NO FEDERAL SALES TAX -- UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES)
To: 2111USMC
He automatically assumes that taxes on all levels will be increased in the future.The best predictor of future direction is past direction.
66 posted on
10/08/2011 5:10:17 PM PDT by
Texan
To: 2111USMC
223 posted on
10/08/2011 9:33:51 PM PDT by
fightinJAG
(Herman Cain actually IS a rocket scientist.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson