[fluffdaddy]

I have no interest in winning anybody over. A politically active person wasting time on Herman Cain is way, way past reaching. The point of exposing Cain's campaign for an empty exercise in vanity is not to win over his supporters, it is to dissuade people from joining their ranks.

A lot of conservatives don't have a candidate right now. Many are disoriented by Sarah Palin’s decision. In the confusion, some will mistake Herman Cain for a real presidential candidate. They need to hear the truth that he isn't.

Cain's dedicated supporters, like Duncan Hunter's last time around, Michelle Bachmann’s three weeks ago and Sarah Palin’s up until last night, are lost in a foolish fantasy. If that's not childish, nothing is and there's no downside to saying so.

[muawiyah]

BTW, don't you support Ricardo Perido?

He said we are all heartless batardes.

I want you to know I am not a batarde.

[NavyCanDo]

Oh you mean childish - like trying to answer an easy question about an opponent’s flip-flooping. That was such a bumbling mess, that it had me thinking my ten year old could have delivered that better.

Perry:
“I think Americans just don’t know sometimes which Mitt Romney they’re dealing with. Is it the Mitt Romney that was on the side of — against the Second Amendment before he was for the Second Amendment? Was it — was before — he was before the social programs from the standpoint of — he was for standing up for Roe versus Wade before he was against first — Roe versus Wade? Him — he was for Race to the Top. He’s for Obamacare and now he’s against it. I mean, we’ll wait until tomorrow and — and — and see which Mitt Romney we’re really talking to tonight.”