[af_vet_rr]

If Romney is the nominee and conservatives choose to support a 3rd party candidate instead of staying home, I’d say they deserve to be under 0bama, Holder, & Co.

A lot of us who won't vote for Romney do so out of strong religious conviction, and oppose him as much as we oppose Obama. Many would no more vote for Romney than they would a muslim or scientologist.

[paudio]

A lot of us who won't vote for Romney do so out of strong religious conviction, and oppose him as much as we oppose Obama. Many would no more vote for Romney than they would a muslim or scientologist.

So, we have two grounds for objection: (1) religious, and (2) policies. The first one would be equally the same between 0bama and Romney. For policies, I'd say one would have been very ignorant if he/she doesn't see any difference between the two, even though they both might be in the unacceptable range. Romney & his Mormonism may have many objectable qualities, but if one cannot see any difference between him and 0bama, I'd say again: he/she deserves to be under 0bama forever.

Again, I'm not suggesting anybody to vote for Romney. I'm arguing against supporting a 3rd party candidate.