[alecqss]

She was convicted on flimsiest evidence. Any court in the US would have thrown that evidence out to begin with.
Crime scene was investigated days after the murder; evidence was peppered with the DNA of multiple unknown persons - none of which was even sought by the police. Behavior and character of Knox was not consistent with the psychotic break or rage, which could be context of Kercher’s murder...

My impression that Knox knows more than she divulged to the police, but 1) highly unlikely a murderer; and 2) there is no evidence that proves her participation in murder beyond reasonable doubt (actually in her case - doubts are overwhelming). If Knox verdict were upheld, it would be indeed bad news - that anyone could be easily framed for murder, any link to the murder scene is enough...

[nikos1121]

I’ve read much on this. After reading Ann Coulter I was convinced she was guilty, but after reading this I concur with you post.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.com/FBI2.html

Ann C. messed up on this one big time. No way this girl should be convicted.