My impression was that Perry’s family leased a hunting area that had a name associated with a rock prior to their leasing it.
Is that correct? They did not own it before, and they only leased it afterwards?
They also changed that name/rock after the lease.
What you cited is not analogous. But the real point of the issue is that the media whoredom have supposed allies picking at each other over a stupid racial non-issue. If the Perry family named the property, it would be something to note as evidence of raqcial ‘insensitivity’. If Perry used the term ‘niggerhead’ often to refer to the hunting property, that’s less significant but still evidence of ‘insensitivity’. But to try and claim Perry is ‘insensitive’ to black people because someone else leased a piece of property to his family that had an ‘insensitive’ name on it which was subsequently (when?) removed by painting over the marker is a ploy by the enemies of we the people, namely the enemedia. Michael Steele is making a fool of his racial self. Cain was tricked into responding to the set-up. I’m not goign to comment further than to say your analogy was flawed in that property was chosen and leased as opposed to just all public properties. The fallacy is the ‘undistributed middle’.