Okay, so now you see it as a definition problem. Clearly, my statement applies to the situation in which the cell does not respond or inadequately responds to the stress. Look at slide 22 of the pdf. It clearly shows the delay for MCS2. On the other hand, MCS1366 does not have the proper tool in the totebag(It was removed by the researcher) and it will die. A bacteria will not die if it gets a little more "food", but it does react.
The rest of our post establishes that a complex directed response is provoked prior too any increase in the use of error prone DNA polymerase.
How does the cell “know” it is under stress you ask in one post.
Then you define stress such that anything that doesn't kill the cell isn't a stress.
Care to deal with your statement that the bacteria will die eventually anyway?
Or would that just further illustrate your ignorance?
Where do you think the novelty in evolution that Shapiro speaks of comes from?
It cannot come from the “tote bag” and still be novel.
Where does this novelty in evolution come from?
I await a coherent answer, most likely in vain.
Where does novelty in evolution come from?