Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndrewC
Wrong. Some genes involved in the “unfolded protein stress response” are decidedly involved in A stress response - but would be entirely inapplicable during other stress responses.

There isn't just ONE stress response.

But error prone DNA polymerase is a stress response gene.

It apparently only “totes” a vanishingly small amount of DNA - how does that small amount of DNA cover the numerous genes that must be modified via mutation from error prone DNA polymerase?

You really think 8% of a bacterial genome can “tote” all the information needed to have the appropriate modifications of every single bacterial gene to every conceivable stress?

So it doesn't HAVE to come from the “tote bag”.

OK then - can you explain to me again why bacteria have a gene for an error prone DNA polymerase and why it would be expressed during stress?

Your ‘answers’ where they are coherent, contradict each other.

409 posted on 10/07/2011 1:40:53 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 408 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
OK then - can you explain to me again why bacteria have a gene for an error prone DNA polymerase and why it would be expressed during stress?

Read my answer again and read your statement in post 407 indicating that you understand my answer.

412 posted on 10/07/2011 1:53:19 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson