Yet I wonder how many would continue in their research if they could not feed so heavily on the federal gov grants and the like.
Would it not improve science if say they had to secure and/or provide their own private funding?
I do not rely upon federal government grants and the like for my research. While federal funding for large projects like Moon landings and Particle Accelerators and the like are somewhat justified because of the size and nature of the endeavor - I am for private funding of scientific research.
I noticed you claimed that error prone DNA polymerase “imply a stored collection of rejected mutations employed as a survival mechanism”.
You claimed to have previously answered my question about error prone DNA polymerase.
With your response you clearly show that you STILL don't even understand the question.
Where do you think a bacteria stores this collection of rejected mutations?
Have you come up with a single example of a large genome species that went extinct due to mutation yet?
Have you questioned your beliefs that are obviously in conflict with reality and not at all backed by evidence yet?
You should.