Ah, yes, resort to ridicule. Much easier than admitting you like your science best b/c so many ‘experts’ and laymen have accepted this paradigm & it can’t possibly be wrong. Why just look at all the scientific books and articles produced.
BTW geology has primarily used uniform rates and circular logic. The fossils are this old because of the rock strata they were found in and the rock strata is this old because of the index fossils found at this layer. And we all know that weathering, layering, and even continental drift all occur at uniform rates because Lyell said so.
What would Lyell say about that last big earthquake in Japan where the land mass moved 7 to 8 feet?
This is an example of what I mean by the quality of the arguments not being likely to change my mind. This isn't about geology, it's about nuclear physics. I don't care about fossils - they aren't part of this equation.
You aren't going to convince me if you can't even stay on topic with regard to this exchange. Answering questions that weren't asked does not impress me. Doing it in lieu of answering the questions that were asked impresses me even less.