Why are so many confuses on this thread reacting to the misleading headline rather than McCain’s reasonable response, which wasn’t bad like Santorum’s? Mark Levin PROVED they didn’t boo him until he talked about reversing ‘progress’ (barf) for fags, and that there were exactly TWO people booing in the entire - huge - audience. Cain basically says that here. So why the attacks on him here? PerryBot desperation?
“...McCains reasonable response,...”
Sigmund Freud, please pick up any house phone. Call waiting.
;)
Re: Herman Cain: “So why the attacks on him here? PerryBot desperation?”
The whole thing stinks. I guess if it smells like a fish...