Posted on 10/02/2011 3:00:31 PM PDT by Baladas
WASHINGTON (AP) Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain said Sunday that he should not have stayed silent after the audience at a GOP debate booed a gay soldier serving in Iraq.
The Georgia businessman told ABC's "This Week" that it would have been "appropriate" for him to have defended the soldier. None of the candidates on stage at the Sept. 22 forum responded to the boos.
"In retrospect, because of the controversy it has created and because of the different interpretations that it could have had, yes, that probably that would have been appropriate," Cain said, when asked if he should have asked the audience to respect the soldier.
Cain said it wasn't immediately clear to him what had drawn the audience's scorn, adding, "I happen to think that maybe they were booing the whole 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal more so than booing that soldier."
The so-called don't ask, don't tell policy barring gays from serving openly in the military was officially lifted last month.
(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...
Shirley you jest. We show here every day how we can defeat ourselves and put the socialist agitator back in office.
We'll show them against all odds how we can bicker over inconsequential matters and let the socialist win, no matter what little guffaws our candidates have, obamao would be better!....yeah, that'll show 'em!!!!!
I totally respect your reverence for our Constitution.
But don't you agree that the Constitution gives Congress the right to issue money? Not some bogus "Federal Reserve System" which is owned and run by foreign bankers?
That's my main beef with Herman Cain. How can a man accept a position with the Federal Reserve who claims to respect The Constitution?
“More Gotcha journalstic malpractice. Going for controversy over substance.”
We know what to expect from the media: Conservative substance IS controversy.
I pray that a candidate willing to mock the controversy rises up.
DESERVE Mitt Romney.
Hermann Cain is NOT defending homosexuals. He is attacking the MSM’s misinterpretation of the booing.
Read the frickin’ article, dumba$$es.
DESERVE Mitt Romney.
Hermann Cain is NOT defending homosexuals. He is attacking the MSM’s misinterpretation of the booing.
Read the frickin’ article, dumba$$es.
My goodness. I am beyond disappointed in the man.
Cain is weak after all.
He should not give any validity to the media/Obama farce on this issue, they are spinning the facts. It will pull him down
The FIRST THING Cain said is he thought they were NOT booing at the soldier. Did you actually read the article?
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.
Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.
Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.
Just read it, AP playing games.
Did you read the article?
Or are you just another toy of the Associated Press?
I was going to give him a chance, but now, no way, José.
RE: Herman Cain’s New Director of Communications
Yes, and he’s no rookie to politics. Since retiring from his public relations work for the military where he would have worked under Donald Rumsfield, he stepped right into American politics doing things for Sarah Palin.
I’ve seen Cain’s new Communications Director referenced on the Conservatives4Palin (C4P) website:
http://conservatives4palin.com/2010/10/j-d-gordon-outsmarting-obama.html
And here is an article Cain’s new Communications Director:
Reasons why Sarah has more brains than Barack
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/22/outsmarting-obama/
He has also been a spokesman for Sarah Palin events:
http://articles.sfgate.com/2010-10-15/news/24136204_1_sarah-palin-palin-effect-gop-vice-presidential-nominee
Wow, guess Gordon was at least an unofficial spokesman for Sarah Palin even while he was in the military.
http://www.adn.com/2007/09/13/220853/governors-son-enlists-on-sept.html
My comment was about your name-calling. That’s juvenile/liberal behavior.
But the “n” word apparently is just fine for Perry supporters.
I don’t trust people who pander. I would have booed that homosexual activist disgrace of a “soldier” right to his gay stinking face.
What ARE you talking about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.