” He said he vetoed a Texas bill that would have given illegal immigrants driver’s licenses,
helped pass a bill requiring voter identification at the polls,
spent $400 million on security measures to help secure the state’s border with Mexico,
and strongly opposed granting amnesty to people who illegally entered the United States.”
How can this be ?
Herman Cain said he couldn’t vote for Perry in the general because
he was “ soft “ on immigration.
Mitt says he’s a liberal on immigration.
If Perry had worded his response differently and highlighted again and
again and again what he has done to combat illegal immigration-
his foes ,
ie: the other potential nominees and the FOX News anchors
wouldn’t have been able
to Alinsky him.
So if Cain is not the nominee, he is for...??
Is he for Obama over Perry, if Perry were nominated?
I say the evidence supports that he’s a Romney man. I just now saw where he endorsed Romney in 2008.
And by his statement, he would sit out the general or vote for a third party if Perry were to be our candidate...??
Something is wrong here...
Great point.
Perry did not help himself in the "debates" but the other thing is he is looking forward to the general election. Apparently, he has enough political savvy to know we need at least 30% of the Hispanic vote and at least 50% of the single "moderate" white women in order to win. The other candidates are just looking at the primaries and will say anything that benefits them now. However, in the general election they will be boxed into positions that will cost them key voting blocks.
Does anyone believe that a northeast blue blood is going to aggressively work to solve illegal immigration?
Herman Cain has a good record on illegal immigration. He, well, he was involved with Burger King, and Godfather’s Pizza, had a talk show, lost a Senate primary.
On second thought, all Cain has is yakity yak. Perry has a real job.
Easy choice.