Okay, okay, sorry bout that. Change it to Ho Chi Minh.
Let’s say we send a B-52 over Hanoi to bomb the crap out of Uncle Ho. In there in the command bunker is some Weatherman commie American citizen who joined up to support the Viet Cong.
Same question?
You have a point which I won’t dispute. You’re correct. (And we should have bombed Hanoi while Jane Fonda was there.) My original point however was an observation in the first sentence of the post. Do you disagree that this has been a politically inspired, contradictory policy of this administration?
That's collateral damage. BFD
And don't send the NOK any appologies, either.
Important distinction —
who was the target?
Collateral damage is not the same as a targeted assassination.