Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gardencatz

Iowa during a stump speech? I’m talking about a Facebook post or some commentary before a national audience that will get widespread media coverage, not a throw-away red meat line in a speech to Tea Party members.

Speeches aren’t worth much to me, and never have been. They are written to sway people without convictions or to make a given audience feel better about themselves, IMO, or even to create a self-image (Obama). I’ve heard Rick Perry is a great speaker as well on the stump, and I’ve never heard him utter a word from the stage, nor do I care to unless it’s a nomination speech or a State of the Union adress.

I did like Palin’s 2008 GOP convention speech, though, and she hit it out of the park. The best GOP move would have been to make her the keynote speaker, let her serve out her term in Alaska, and spring her on the national stage this election cycle.

Unfortunately for all of us, McLame was panicking and needed a conservative fresh face to try and stop Obama’s fresh face. This led to a sequence of events that makes Palin damaged goods for many voters she would need to not only win the nomination, but also to win the presidency. Some of it is her fault, most of it is not, but the reality is that she was simply not ready for the media onslaught, and in politics, sometimes you only get one chance to make that first national impression.


63 posted on 09/27/2011 11:17:04 PM PDT by Carling (Mitt Romney Signed a Bill that Mandated Taxpayer-funded Abortions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Carling

Oh, so the venue is important? A speech covered by television that goes into millions of homes vs. a facebook post? Why is one better than the other. If she’d done a facebook post you’d say she should’ve said something that would be seen by a bigger audience.

Cindie


68 posted on 09/27/2011 11:22:10 PM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

Had it not been for John McCain’s desire for a vivacious running mate, Sarah Palin would in all likelihood still be puttering along in Alaska, not even thinking about national politics. This might not be how you or I might write a story, but when God is writing the story we can expect man’s rules to be broken.


69 posted on 09/27/2011 11:22:22 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Carling

“Unfortunately for all of us, McLame was panicking and needed a conservative fresh face to try and stop Obama’s fresh face. This led to a sequence of events that makes Palin damaged goods for many voters she would need to not only win the nomination, but also to win the presidency. Some of it is her fault, most of it is not, but the reality is that she was simply not ready for the media onslaught, and in politics, sometimes you only get one chance to make that first national impression.”

It’s sad if you think of it. If McCain didn’t pick her, she would’ve been re-elected to a second term as governor and she would’ve been a much stronger force.


71 posted on 09/27/2011 11:24:21 PM PDT by ari-freedom (I'm a heartless conservative because I love this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson