Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RitaOK

That wasn’t quite what she said, I don’t think she was trying to get a dig in, she paid him several compliments. I think she used him as an example of the fickle nature of the lame stream media. Bad example I felt, the attention he is getting is well earned. I was rather troubled by her reference to the Presidency as a title and do you need it to accomplish change in America. Well, of course you don’t. But you run for President if you want to truly lead the country, not because you want to head some movement and would the Presidency be an effective tool for that movement. After hearing her make those comments, I really hope she does not run.


46 posted on 09/27/2011 7:53:56 PM PDT by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: visualops

That wasn’t quite what she said, I don’t think she was trying to get a dig in, she paid him several compliments. “ <<<

You’re absolutely correct. She covered very well for deftly pointing out that Cain is the “flavor of the week” and blaming the media. After all, he may be a good man but that’s HER constituency he’s getting and she knows it. Tonight’s remarks in some other areas could come back on her. I believe you were very astute on some of those other areas. She sees herself as a movement deserving of a coronation sans the negative press and any pesky intrusion and scrutiny into and of her charactoristically policy-free policy.


64 posted on 09/27/2011 8:13:54 PM PDT by RitaOK (TEXAS. It's EXHIBIT A for Rick, who needs to pound the fiction flackers back into the Stone Age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson