Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan

I think Philip I of Macedon did a pretty good job of dividing the city-states prior to military operations while Xerxes did a pretty good job of uniting them.

Agree with your other observations, btw!


14 posted on 09/26/2011 8:37:45 AM PDT by Tallguy (You can safely ignore anything that precedes the word "But"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy
Xerxes did a pretty good job of uniting them.

Common idea but mistaken.

The considerable majority of continental Greek states medized, notably including Thebes, one of the great powers of the Greek world, Macedonia, the Thessalians, etc. Many Greeks fought on the other side at Salamis, for instance, though quite possibly with no great enthusiasm.

The Persians were not Assyrians, and were by comparison to other great empires remarkably tolerant and allowed their subject peoples significant freedom.

Given how the Greeks tore their world apart in civil war not too long after, it is possible to make a good case they would have been better off, materially at least, had they submitted to the Pax Persiana.

15 posted on 09/26/2011 9:15:01 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson