Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CEOs rewarded most for raising unemployment
Guardian ^

Posted on 09/25/2011 4:17:55 PM PDT by AfricanChristian

Black & Decker is a household name across the US, as in the UK – as the maker of home and garden improvement products such as the power drill. The company made $8.4bn in sales in 2010 in the US, with net earnings of $198m.

The 101-year-old Maryland-based company has also recently risen in the Fortune standings of top businesses from number 543 to number 288. For this stellar performance, John Lundgren, the CEO, was paid $32.6m last year, a 253% raise over the previous year.

In short, this looks like a solidly successful business that might seem worth emulating in the national search for ideas on how to overcome the economic recession and beat unemployment. Yet – as the latest jobs numbers show no net growth and unemployment stubbornly stuck at 9.1% – the opposite seems to be true.

Not all Lundgren's employees were quite as well rewarded as he was – some 4,000 of the 38,000 Black & Decker worldwide workforce were projected to lose their jobs. Nor did his company give much back to the public – instead, Black & Decker collected $75m in tax refunds from the government in 2010.

Lundgren is one of ten CEOs profiled in of "Executive Excess 2011: The Massive CEO Rewards for Tax Dodging", an annual report published by the Institute for Policy Studies. "Guns don't kill people, the old saw goes. People do," write the authors Sarah Anderson, Chuck Collins, Scott Klinger and Sam Pizzigati. "By the same token, corporations don't dodge taxes. People do. The people who run corporations."

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ceo; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: WalterSobchak2012

I think enforcing the Clayton Act, and getting rid of interlocking directorates would go a long way towards solving some of these problems.


21 posted on 09/25/2011 9:28:08 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I was hired to work 37.5 hours a week, not 50. If I work 10 extra hours a week, someone is reaping the profit from that. You can’t switch jobs because no one will hire a IT person that is over 55.


22 posted on 09/25/2011 9:32:02 PM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Plumres
"Oh, Plumres, no, don't use logic, it only makes them madder than they already are, diplomacy, you know the art of saying nice doggie, nice doggie, until you can pick up a rock!"
23 posted on 09/25/2011 9:35:20 PM PDT by de.rm ('Most people never believe anything you tell them unless it isn't true."-Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Plumres; dfwgator
Was there a "mutual agreement" to work 50 hrs plus weekends for the same salary? Didn't think so.

Corp execs know when they have you facing an unemployment nightmare -- and yank you around by the short hairs.

That is the reward folks get for loyalty to their employer.

24 posted on 09/25/2011 10:44:49 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson