Thank you for getting back to the reality of what a "Straw Poll" is: A popularity contest, among a small sampling of political junkies, many of whom share a common agenda.
A Straw Poll is a "Self-Selection Bias" poll with as little validity as an Internet poll that attracts the hard-core, agenda-driven, political junkies while ignoring the vast majority of regular voters whose opinion actually elects Presidents.
Case in point: Who won the third debate, according to the "Self-Selection Bias" FOX News Internet poll by a very wide margin?
HINT: Who is followed around by a small but very vocal army of hard-core True Believers? (No, not her. She did not debate.)
You guessed it: The BIG winner of the last debate was, supposedly, Ron Paul. (See below)
That is not to say that Cain does not have merit as a viable candidate. That is just saying that, until the first rigorously conducted polls come out after this last debate, it is silly to hang your hat on the results of a Self-Selection Bias poll.
I appreciate your commitment to objectivity.
To me, all these polls and straw polls seem like a way for the cable channels to fill time during a notoriously slow news time. They are less than useless to realists.
My thoughts: This time in 2008, Giuliani and Fred Thompson were the top two GOP candidates. What happened to them?