Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: redpoll
Our military assets being so spread out 'round the world, and therefore capable of a nuke strike (or our own EMP only hits) is probably the only thing that has kept it at bay thus far.

On another level, I was at a conference recently and heard directly from those within the utility industry how many cyber attack attempts they are getting a week--most very sophisticated and thought to originate from foreign sponsored sources/governments. They are getting so many that they are almost (in my perception) numb to it and take it as an expectation.

Those attackers only need to be successful one time, and no messy fingerprints as the way a nuke/EMP would be.

20 posted on 09/24/2011 10:41:05 AM PDT by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Sam's Army

I was thinking along these lines myself.

An EMP attack would be bold and in your face. It would also provoke a powerful response. However, “the death by a thousand cuts” would eventually bleed out the victim before they’re aware of it. The communists in the Frankfurt School pioneered the effort; the Islamists are using the strategy by setting up schools within the enemy camp and slowly establishing shari’a. I fear that kind of subversion far more than a nuclear blast over Kansas.


22 posted on 09/24/2011 10:56:21 AM PDT by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson