IMO you’ve gone down the “I don’t wanna see it” rabbit hole already. I just showed you him pumping the bubble at its peak. I trust you can verify for yourself that he supported the bailouts. If you can’t add these together and figure out that this is no man of the people, I’m not sure what else to say.
>>> IMO you’ve gone down the “I don’t wanna see it” rabbit hole already.
No... I have not. I am sick and tired of getting burned by politicians (and propagandists) who have learned that people will believe anything you tell them if you say it often enough.
>>> I trust you can verify for yourself
Yes... I can verify for myself... and so far, your claims are not matching up with your evidence.
I do know this... if Cain had supported the bailouts in any way shape or form, the MSM would have been ALL OVER IT!!!
and so far, all they can come up with is a little known tricky catch phrase called “right of return”.
>>> If you can’t add these together and figure out that this is no man of the people, I’m not sure what else to say.
I’m not asking you to say anything.
I’m asking you to show me WHAT HERMAN CAIN has said or done that is inconsistent with his message.
>>> I just showed you him pumping the bubble at its peak.
Would you like to be more specific about this one?
How did Cain “pump the bubble”???
Did he join the picketers that were forcing banks to make bad loans???
Was he defending Fannymay/Freddie mac in any way? or Dodd/Frank???
When you pump something, you are feeding it... contributing to it... supporting it.
The only substance you have offered so far is an article where Cain slams the media... and rightly so.
His point was not about easing tension over housing prices, it was about the media using fear to create panic and therefore less confidence in the economy.
If anything, he was pumping confidence.
He could not have been pumping the bubble unless he was directly contributing to the bailout problem... which was bad loans.