[Huck]

lol. He would say that. It's not debating that is the issue. It's the ability to effectively communicate and sell your ideas.

And it's not either/or. A candidate should have a record, a vision, AND the ability to effectively express/sell that vision.

Perry's record isn't that great. His vision, what we know of it, is indistinguishable from the other candidates, and his ability to communicate is demonstrably weak.

[Marty62]

Yeah keep under estimating Perry.

I guess you will be voting for Obama or Romney.
The very same complaints against Perry were voiced against Sarah Palin in 2008. Perry has won 3 elections for Gov. and EVERY election the oposition claimed he soes lousey in debates. Yet when push comes to shove. Vote for a true Conservative or choose the Dum or RINO of your choice.

You can put lipstick on a Pig. It’s STILL a PIG.

[TexasFreeper2009]

quote “Perry’s record isn’t that great”

lol

that’s the most ridiculous comment i’ve seen in quite awhile. Almost akin to saying Americas record really isn’t that great.

[Nonstatist]

Perry's record isn't that great. His vision, what we know of it, is indistinguishable from the other candidates, and his ability to communicate is demonstrably weak.

Pretty much. If you can't talk coherently enough to make cogent arguments and think on your feet, then you might as well stay home and take care of the ranch.

[editor-surveyor]

>> “Perry’s record isn’t that great. His vision, what we know of it, is indistinguishable from the other candidates, and his ability to communicate is demonstrably weak.” <<

.
Perry, in a nutshell!