[Vigilanteman]

The only argument the Perrybots have left is "Vote for our guy or you get Mitt Romney by default." To which I shrug "So what? We'd be getting him anyway if we vote for youor guy."

Swap their constituencies and you'd swap their records.One loves open borders, one loves socialized medicine. It is a pretty academic argument as to which is worse for America.

[Poser]

I see very little difference between Perry and Romney except that Romney is a much better speaker. Perry is reminiscent of GW Bush in speaking style and ability.

Santorum, Cain and Newt are all fabulous speakers with better conservative credentials. Bachmann just doesn’t seem ready for the job (to me) and Huntsman is too liberal.

Ron Paul is just nuts. I love listening to him, but he’s nuts.

[Kartographer]

"The only argument the Perrybots have left is "Vote for our guy or you get Mitt Romney by default."

The only argument the Mittens have is "Vote for our guy or you get Rick Perry by default." Two sides of the same two faced coin.

[Mr Rogers]

“Swap their constituencies and you’d swap their records.”

Worth repeating. Perry’s conservatism isn’t from the heart, but what he needed to be elected in Texas. Mitt...well, his conservatism is also head knowledge. He can talk about the 2nd Amendment, for example, but it will never be a part of who he is.

Both are mirrors. They reflect the views of whoever they want votes from. And put either in Washington DC, and the people surrounding them will be liberals - because let’s face it, most of the Republicans in DC are liberal in their hearts.

[Eva]

That makes no sense.