Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo

Well, this part of the article suggests they ARE comparing it to the speed of light in the medium:

“Light would have covered the distance in around 2.4 thousandths of a second, but the neutrinos took 60 nanoseconds - or 60 billionths of a second - less than light beams would have taken.”

Might just be a poorly written article though.


78 posted on 09/22/2011 10:27:10 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman
"Well, this part of the article suggests they ARE comparing it to the speed of light in the medium:"

No, they're just talking about the distance divided by C. This wasn't a race between photons and neutrinos. It's just a matter of how fast the neutrinos were moving.

BTW, I suspect a measurement problem somewhere rather than a violation of relativity. But it would certainly be interesting if this turned out to be real.

80 posted on 09/22/2011 10:31:44 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson