To: T-Bird45
Guess the tongue-in-cheek, wry humor doesn’t work on FR?
There is a number of people here who would readily believe that Swift really meant that we should eat the children of the poor.
38 posted on
09/22/2011 5:38:43 PM PDT by
Peet
(Cogito ergo dubito.)
To: Peet
Common sense would tell us that the children of the rich would be much more nutritious, and therefore a better value per child eaten.
39 posted on
09/22/2011 9:43:22 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Peet
P.S. Keeping in mind we are talking about the children in the US, the children of the poor probably have a much higher fat content as well, and would be high on cholesterol.
40 posted on
09/22/2011 9:46:18 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson