Lets see:
FOREMAN: Hi, John. Representative Bachmann, I have a question for you. Governor Pawlenty says he opposes abortion rights except in cases of rape, incest, or when the mother's life is at stake. Do you have any problem with that position? And if so, why?
Not exactly inane!
KING: Mr. Speaker, if you look at a poll in the Boston Globe just the other day, 54 percent of Republican voters in this state say they're willing to have higher taxes on the wealthy to help bring down the deficit. Are they wrong?
Not inane.
QUESTION: Yes. As a journalist who's written frequently about health care and medicine for both newspapers and for corporate publications, I'm very concerned about the overreach of the massive health care legislation that was passed last year. My question is, what would each candidate do? What three steps would they take to de- fund Obamacare and repeal it as soon as possible? Thank you.
Not inane. I could post most questions that weren't inane but you've already been discredited.
These debates, with the possible exception of the Tea-party based event, were Inane, no doubt about it. You asked for an inanity, in the singular. I gave you one, as well as its related inanities. Its the epitome of inanity. But MOST of the other questions, while appearing to be relevant, were leftist questions by folks that know what they are doing to shape the discourse in favor of their deity, and it Aint any of the republican candidates. They are designed to steer the public discussion AWAY from zer0, and towards cutting up the republican side (as Newt so aptly has sensed and commented on).
And for the future, I trust you will Enjoy further the remaining INANE debates.